Syrian Arab Republic vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 369,950 t against -47,770 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 417,720 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 7.7 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 12th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 18 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -22,530 t | 394,522 t | 417,052 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | -26,988 t | 463,270 t | 490,258 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | -37,635 t | 517,991 t | 555,627 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | -39,041 t | 408,296 t | 447,337 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Syrian Arab Republic or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 369,950 t against -47,770 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Syrian Arab Republic and Yugoslav SFR?
- 417,720 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 12th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).