Turkmenistan vs Uruguay: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Turkmenistan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 107,790 t against 87,312 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 20,478 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Turkmenistan ranks 36th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Turkmenistan averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turkmenistan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,025 t | 31,859 t | 12,835 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 57,882 t | 22,088 t | 35,794 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 69,923 t | 37,838 t | 32,085 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 74,507 t | 82,144 t | 7,637 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Turkmenistan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 107,790 t against 87,312 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Turkmenistan and Uruguay?
- 20,478 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Turkmenistan and Uruguay rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Turkmenistan ranks 36th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).