Angola vs European Union (27): Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Angola
94.45 % change on previous year
in 2024
European Union (27)
5.84 % change on previous year
in 2024
Angola rank
9th
European Union (27) rank
10th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Angola
  • European Union (27)
-1000100200300196219932024

How they compare

Angola currently reports 94.45 % change on previous year against 5.84 % change on previous year in European Union (27), a difference of 88.61 % change on previous year.

That makes Angola's figure about 16.2 times European Union (27)'s.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1962 it was European Union (27) ahead.

Angola ranks 9th and European Union (27) ranks 10th of 211 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 5 and European Union (27) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola European Union (27) Difference Ahead
1960s 43.43 % change on previous year 8.93 % change on previous year 34.5 % change on previous year Angola
1970s -9.27 % change on previous year 4.89 % change on previous year 14.16 % change on previous year European Union (27)
1980s 21.2 % change on previous year 0.6479 % change on previous year 20.55 % change on previous year Angola
1990s -6.65 % change on previous year -1.45 % change on previous year 5.19 % change on previous year European Union (27)
2000s 39.75 % change on previous year -2.06 % change on previous year 41.8 % change on previous year Angola
2010s 8.03 % change on previous year 1.11 % change on previous year 6.92 % change on previous year Angola
2020s 29.13 % change on previous year -1.51 % change on previous year 30.64 % change on previous year Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Angola or European Union (27)?
Angola, at 94.45 % change on previous year against 5.84 % change on previous year in European Union (27) as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Angola and European Union (27)?
88.61 % change on previous year, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and European Union (27)?
60 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Angola and European Union (27) rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Angola ranks 9th and European Union (27) ranks 10th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs European Union (27): Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/angola/european-union-27/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/angola/european-union-27/">Angola vs European Union (27): Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 12,401 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.