Belarus vs Middle Africa: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Belarus
464,302 t
in 2024
Middle Africa
143,994 t
in 2024
Belarus rank
33rd
Middle Africa rank
31st
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Belarus
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 464,302 t against 143,994 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 320,308 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 3.2 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 33rd and Middle Africa ranks 31st of 212 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 251,625 t | 27,658 t | 223,967 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 388,320 t | 38,704 t | 349,616 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 469,046 t | 86,385 t | 382,662 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 461,519 t | 125,438 t | 336,081 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Belarus or Middle Africa?
- Belarus, at 464,302 t against 143,994 t in Middle Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 320,308 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Middle Africa rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Belarus ranks 33rd and Middle Africa ranks 31st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.