Belarus vs New Zealand: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Belarus
464,302 t
in 2024
New Zealand
387,000 t
in 2024
Belarus rank
33rd
New Zealand rank
36th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Belarus
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 464,302 t against 387,000 t in New Zealand, a difference of 77,302 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 36th of 212 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 251,625 t | 136,191 t | 115,434 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 388,320 t | 305,174 t | 83,146 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 469,046 t | 406,000 t | 63,046 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 461,519 t | 413,200 t | 48,319 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Belarus or New Zealand?
- Belarus, at 464,302 t against 387,000 t in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Belarus and New Zealand?
- 77,302 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Belarus ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 36th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.