Bhutan vs Malta: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Bhutan
641 t
in 2024
Malta
586 t
in 2024
Bhutan rank
168th
Malta rank
169th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Bhutan
- Malta
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 641 t against 586 t in Malta, a difference of 55 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 47 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Malta ahead.
Bhutan ranks 168th and Malta ranks 169th of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 95.67 t | 391.17 t | 295.5 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 103.9 t | 485.8 t | 381.9 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 100 t | 560.75 t | 460.75 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 903.12 t | 553.5 t | 349.62 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 882.5 t | 567.4 t | 315.1 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 751.6 t | 586 t | 165.6 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Bhutan or Malta?
- Bhutan, at 641 t against 586 t in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Bhutan and Malta?
- 55 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Malta?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Malta rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Bhutan ranks 168th and Malta ranks 169th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.