Central African Republic vs Grenada: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Central African Republic
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 34 t against 19 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 15 t.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.8 times Central African Republic's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Grenada ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 196th and Grenada ranks 193rd of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 158.88 t | 133.88 t | 25 t | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 189.8 t | 155.1 t | 34.7 t | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 112.4 t | 132.4 t | 20 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Central African Republic or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 34 t against 19 t in Central African Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Central African Republic and Grenada?
- 15 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Grenada?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Central African Republic and Grenada rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Central African Republic ranks 196th and Grenada ranks 193rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.