Chile vs Serbia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Chile
240,960 t
in 2024
Serbia
262,978 t
in 2024
Chile rank
47th
Serbia rank
45th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 262,978 t against 240,960 t in Chile, a difference of 22,018 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Chile ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 45th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 226,718 t | 281,721 t | 55,003 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 259,119 t | 225,981 t | 33,138 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 241,110 t | 221,913 t | 19,197 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Chile or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 262,978 t against 240,960 t in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Chile and Serbia?
- 22,018 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Chile ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 45th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.