Croatia vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Croatia
90,886 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
96,590 t
in 2024
Croatia rank
85th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Croatia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 96,590 t against 90,886 t in Croatia, a difference of 5,704 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 107,565 t | 86,452 t | 21,113 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 149,896 t | 65,029 t | 84,868 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 97,041 t | 53,876 t | 43,165 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 93,464 t | 103,857 t | 10,393 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Croatia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 96,590 t against 90,886 t in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 5,704 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Croatia ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.