Cuba vs Eswatini: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cuba
5,163 t
in 2024
Eswatini
5,842 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
149th
Eswatini rank
147th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 5,842 t against 5,163 t in Cuba, a difference of 679 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 149th and Eswatini ranks 147th of 212 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 108,967 t | 2,729 t | 106,238 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 172,690 t | 4,673 t | 168,017 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 300,200 t | 6,888 t | 293,312 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 141,930 t | 3,659 t | 138,271 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 47,621 t | 4,446 t | 43,175 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 56,612 t | 5,706 t | 50,906 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 21,111 t | 7,220 t | 13,891 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cuba or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 5,842 t against 5,163 t in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cuba and Eswatini?
- 679 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 149th and Eswatini ranks 147th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.