Cuba vs Palestine, State of: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cuba
5,163 t
in 2024
Palestine, State of
4,228 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
149th
Palestine, State of rank
151st
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 5,163 t against 4,228 t in Palestine, State of, a difference of 935 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Palestine, State of's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 149th and Palestine, State of ranks 151st of 212 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35,202 t | 8,914 t | 26,288 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 56,612 t | 6,909 t | 49,703 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 21,111 t | 5,907 t | 15,205 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cuba or Palestine, State of?
- Cuba, at 5,163 t against 4,228 t in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cuba and Palestine, State of?
- 935 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Palestine, State of?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Palestine, State of rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 149th and Palestine, State of ranks 151st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.