Czechoslovakia vs Saudi Arabia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 280,000 t against 258,330 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 21,670 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 43rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 46th of 212 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 252,444 t | 2,165 t | 250,279 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 526,745 t | 5,301 t | 521,444 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 649,500 t | 146,474 t | 503,026 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 385,367 t | 283,000 t | 102,367 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Czechoslovakia or Saudi Arabia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 280,000 t against 258,330 t in Saudi Arabia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Czechoslovakia and Saudi Arabia?
- 21,670 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 43rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 46th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.