Ecuador vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Ecuador
64,418 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan
70,400 t
in 2024
Ecuador rank
93rd
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Ecuador
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 70,400 t against 64,418 t in Ecuador, a difference of 5,982 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 93rd and Kazakhstan ranks 90th of 212 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 63,650 t | 61,225 t | 2,425 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 135,414 t | 26,080 t | 109,334 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 180,930 t | 74,120 t | 106,810 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 145,272 t | 73,520 t | 71,752 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Ecuador or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 70,400 t against 64,418 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Ecuador and Kazakhstan?
- 5,982 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Ecuador ranks 93rd and Kazakhstan ranks 90th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.