Grenada vs Sao Tome and Principe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Grenada
34 t
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
70 t
in 2024
Grenada rank
193rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
190th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Grenada
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 70 t against 34 t in Grenada, a difference of 36 t.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 193rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 190th of 212 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 133.88 t | 49.75 t | 84.12 t | Grenada |
| 2010s | 155.1 t | 83.8 t | 71.3 t | Grenada |
| 2020s | 132.4 t | 113 t | 19.4 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Grenada or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 70 t against 34 t in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 36 t, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Grenada ranks 193rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 190th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.