Kazakhstan vs Latvia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Kazakhstan
70,400 t
in 2024
Latvia
82,435 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Latvia rank
88th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Kazakhstan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 82,435 t against 70,400 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 12,035 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 88th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61,225 t | 31,638 t | 29,588 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 26,080 t | 39,540 t | 13,460 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 74,120 t | 71,516 t | 2,605 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 73,520 t | 82,810 t | 9,289 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 82,435 t against 70,400 t in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Latvia?
- 12,035 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Latvia rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 88th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.