Kazakhstan vs Sudan (former): Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 87,550 t against 70,400 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 17,150 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Sudan (former) ranks 87th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61,225 t | 44,700 t | 16,525 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 26,080 t | 57,163 t | 31,083 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 44,112 t | 108,480 t | 64,368 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 87,550 t against 70,400 t in Kazakhstan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Sudan (former)?
- 17,150 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan (former) rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Sudan (former) ranks 87th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.