Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Kyrgyzstan
23,077 t
in 2024
Namibia
20,750 t
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
122nd
Namibia rank
124th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 23,077 t against 20,750 t in Namibia, a difference of 2,327 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 124th of 212 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27,282 t | 100 t | 27,182 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 25,388 t | 1,161 t | 24,228 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 22,585 t | 12,740 t | 9,845 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 23,589 t | 11,730 t | 11,859 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 23,077 t against 20,750 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 2,327 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 124th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.