Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
3.32 million t
in 2024
Poland
1.16 million t
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
17th
Poland rank
20th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Poland
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 3.32 million t against 1.16 million t in Poland, a difference of 2.16 million t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.9 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th and Poland ranks 20th of 31 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 4 and Poland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 56,741 t 488,039 t 431,298 t Poland
1970s 165,586 t 1.12 million t 956,990 t Poland
1980s 283,404 t 1.34 million t 1.06 million t Poland
1990s 1.25 million t 801,240 t 451,157 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.30 million t 969,340 t 333,588 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 2.42 million t 1.09 million t 1.34 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.16 million t 1.04 million t 2.12 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Poland?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 3.32 million t against 1.16 million t in Poland as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland?
2.16 million t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th and Poland ranks 20th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,879 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.