Latvia vs Sudan (former): Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Latvia
82,435 t
in 2024
Sudan (former)
87,550 t
in 2011
Latvia rank
88th
Sudan (former) rank
87th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Latvia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 87,550 t against 82,435 t in Latvia, a difference of 5,115 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 88th and Sudan (former) ranks 87th of 212 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,638 t | 44,700 t | 13,062 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 39,540 t | 57,163 t | 17,624 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 60,259 t | 108,480 t | 48,221 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Latvia or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 87,550 t against 82,435 t in Latvia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Latvia and Sudan (former)?
- 5,115 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Latvia and Sudan (former) rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Latvia ranks 88th and Sudan (former) ranks 87th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.