Malawi vs Norway: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Malawi
96,036 t
in 2024
Norway
99,336 t
in 2024
Malawi rank
84th
Norway rank
81st
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Malawi
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 99,336 t against 96,036 t in Malawi, a difference of 3,300 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Malawi ranks 84th and Norway ranks 81st of 212 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,354 t | 62,751 t | 59,397 t | Norway |
| 1970s | 12,712 t | 93,570 t | 80,858 t | Norway |
| 1980s | 24,545 t | 109,480 t | 84,935 t | Norway |
| 1990s | 35,696 t | 109,582 t | 73,886 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 64,776 t | 102,310 t | 37,533 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 84,888 t | 98,441 t | 13,553 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 102,692 t | 105,109 t | 2,417 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Malawi or Norway?
- Norway, at 99,336 t against 96,036 t in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Malawi and Norway?
- 3,300 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Norway?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Norway rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Malawi ranks 84th and Norway ranks 81st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.