Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Malawi
96,036 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
96,590 t
in 2024
Malawi rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 96,590 t against 96,036 t in Malawi, a difference of 554 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Malawi ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,354 t | 31,588 t | 28,234 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 12,712 t | 61,938 t | 49,226 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 24,545 t | 85,058 t | 60,514 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 35,696 t | 87,642 t | 51,946 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 64,776 t | 65,029 t | 252.2 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 84,888 t | 53,876 t | 31,012 t | Malawi |
| 2020s | 102,692 t | 103,857 t | 1,165 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 96,590 t against 96,036 t in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 554 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Malawi ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.