Montenegro vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Montenegro
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 1,351 t against 927 t in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 424 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.5 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Montenegro ranks 164th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 167th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,384 t | 5,175 t | 3,791 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 1,291 t | 4,532 t | 3,241 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 1,293 t | 1,045 t | 247.4 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Montenegro or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Montenegro, at 1,351 t against 927 t in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 424 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Montenegro ranks 164th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 167th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.