Oman vs Rwanda: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Oman
12,821 t
in 2024
Rwanda
15,116 t
in 2024
Oman rank
136th
Rwanda rank
134th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Oman
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 15,116 t against 12,821 t in Oman, a difference of 2,295 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 136th and Rwanda ranks 134th of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 268.86 t | 118 t | 150.86 t | Oman |
| 1980s | 1,048 t | 548.4 t | 499.8 t | Oman |
| 1990s | 5,250 t | 363.8 t | 4,886 t | Oman |
| 2000s | 6,536 t | 1,037 t | 5,499 t | Oman |
| 2010s | 9,546 t | 5,571 t | 3,974 t | Oman |
| 2020s | 11,111 t | 13,687 t | 2,576 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Oman or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 15,116 t against 12,821 t in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Oman and Rwanda?
- 2,295 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Rwanda?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2024.
- How do Oman and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Oman ranks 136th and Rwanda ranks 134th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.