Poland vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Poland
1.16 million t
in 2024
Uzbekistan
908,559 t
in 2024
Poland rank
20th
Uzbekistan rank
23rd
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Poland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Poland currently reports 1.16 million t against 908,559 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 247,561 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.3 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Poland ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 212 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 846,513 t | 769,612 t | 76,900 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 969,340 t | 554,164 t | 415,176 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 1.09 million t | 693,651 t | 393,039 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 1.04 million t | 905,555 t | 129,693 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Poland or Uzbekistan?
- Poland, at 1.16 million t against 908,559 t in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 247,561 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Poland ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.