Sao Tome and Principe vs Singapore: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Singapore
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 70 t against 41 t in Singapore, a difference of 29 t.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.7 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 190th and Singapore ranks 191st of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.75 t | 47.12 t | 2.62 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 83.8 t | 921.6 t | 837.8 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 113 t | 42.6 t | 70.4 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Sao Tome and Principe or Singapore?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 70 t against 41 t in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore?
- 29 t, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Singapore rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 190th and Singapore ranks 191st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.