Saudi Arabia vs Serbia and Montenegro: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 276,952 t against 258,330 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 18,622 t.
That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 46th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 44th of 212 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 206,625 t | 121,675 t | 84,950 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 223,727 t | 214,638 t | 9,088 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Saudi Arabia or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 276,952 t against 258,330 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2005.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Saudi Arabia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 18,622 t, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 46th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 44th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.