Comoros vs Liberia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita
Comoros
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Liberia
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Comoros rank
146th
Liberia rank
143rd
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita over time
- Comoros
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0.0004 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Comoros, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 146th and Liberia ranks 143rd of 173 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Liberia |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | Liberia |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per capita, Comoros or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 0.0004 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Comoros as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per capita between Comoros and Liberia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Liberia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Comoros and Liberia rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per capita?
- Comoros ranks 146th and Liberia ranks 143rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.