Egypt vs Luxembourg: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita
Egypt
0.0136 t per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
0.0141 t per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
44th
Luxembourg rank
43rd
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.0141 t per person against 0.0136 t per person in Egypt, a difference of 0.0005 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Egypt ranks 44th and Luxembourg ranks 43rd of 173 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0149 t per person | 0.0294 t per person | 0.0145 t per person | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.0123 t per person | 0.0238 t per person | 0.0115 t per person | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.0135 t per person | 0.0157 t per person | 0.0022 t per person | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per capita, Egypt or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.0141 t per person against 0.0136 t per person in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per capita between Egypt and Luxembourg?
- 0.0005 t per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Luxembourg rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 44th and Luxembourg ranks 43rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.