How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Central African Republic?

22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs Central African Republic: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre

Aruba

0 t per square kilometre

in 2023

Central African Republic

0.0001 t per square kilometre

in 2023

Aruba rank

168th

Central African Republic rank

166th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre over time

Aruba
Central African Republic

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0001 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Aruba ranks 168th and Central African Republic ranks 166th of 173 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	Central African Republic	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0014 t per square kilometre	0.0003 t per square kilometre	0.0011 t per square kilometre	Aruba
2010s	0.0961 t per square kilometre	0.0003 t per square kilometre	0.0958 t per square kilometre	Aruba
2020s	0.0153 t per square kilometre	0.0002 t per square kilometre	0.0151 t per square kilometre	Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre, Aruba or Central African Republic?: Central African Republic, at 0.0001 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre between Aruba and Central African Republic?: 0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Central African Republic?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Central African Republic rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per square kilometre?: Aruba ranks 168th and Central African Republic ranks 166th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Central African Republic: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/aruba/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/aruba/central-african-republic/">Aruba vs Central African Republic: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit: t per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 174 places, 8,896 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 15 September 2026

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.