Eritrea vs Libya: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Libya
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
111th
Libya rank
109th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Eritrea, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 111th and Libya ranks 109th of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Libya?
- Libya, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Libya?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Libya?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Libya rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 111th and Libya ranks 109th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.