Eritrea vs Palestine: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Palestine
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
111th
Palestine rank
113th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Palestine
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Palestine, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 111th and Palestine ranks 113th of 172 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Palestine |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Palestine?
- Eritrea, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Palestine as of 2011.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Palestine?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Palestine?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Palestine rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 111th and Palestine ranks 113th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.