Sri Lanka vs Sudan: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 140,628 t against 120,476 t in Sudan, a difference of 20,152 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 68th and Sudan ranks 71st of 210 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 138,744 t | 96,941 t | 41,803 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 147,521 t | 146,314 t | 1,207 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use, Sri Lanka or Sudan?
- Sri Lanka, at 140,628 t against 120,476 t in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use between Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 20,152 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sudan rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — agricultural use?
- Sri Lanka ranks 68th and Sudan ranks 71st of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf