China vs Serbia: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
China
297,815 t
in 2024
Serbia
271,298 t
in 2024
China rank
38th
Serbia rank
40th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- China
- Serbia
How they compare
China currently reports 297,815 t against 271,298 t in Serbia, a difference of 26,517 t.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was China ahead.
China ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 40th of 218 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 468,251 t | 184,430 t | 283,821 t | China |
| 2010s | 372,158 t | 167,726 t | 204,432 t | China |
| 2020s | 278,856 t | 254,681 t | 24,175 t | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, China or Serbia?
- China, at 297,815 t against 271,298 t in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between China and Serbia?
- 26,517 t, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do China and Serbia rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- China ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 40th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity with 74 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.