Congo vs Cuba: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Congo
3,414 t
in 2024
Cuba
3,932 t
in 2024
Congo rank
161st
Cuba rank
159th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Congo
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 3,932 t against 3,414 t in Congo, a difference of 518 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
Across all 64 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 161st and Cuba ranks 159th of 218 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 821.89 t | 113,651 t | 112,829 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 1,336 t | 137,349 t | 136,012 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 573.7 t | 181,986 t | 181,412 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 1,594 t | 71,030 t | 69,436 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 620.3 t | 30,258 t | 29,637 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 472.5 t | 43,251 t | 42,778 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2,740 t | 11,710 t | 8,970 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Congo or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 3,932 t against 3,414 t in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Congo and Cuba?
- 518 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Cuba?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Cuba rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 161st and Cuba ranks 159th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity with 74 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.