Mozambique vs Serbia and Montenegro: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Mozambique
125,174 t
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
124,079 t
in 2005
Mozambique rank
64th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
66th
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Mozambique
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 125,174 t against 124,079 t in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 1,095 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 64th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 66th of 218 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,412 t | 61,559 t | 57,146 t | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 12,124 t | 107,967 t | 95,844 t | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Mozambique or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Mozambique, at 125,174 t against 124,079 t in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Mozambique and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 1,095 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Mozambique and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Mozambique ranks 64th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 66th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity with 74 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.