Serbia and Montenegro vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 124,079 t against 116,480 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 7,599 t.
That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 218 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61,559 t | 17,050 t | 44,509 t | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 107,967 t | 19,863 t | 88,104 t | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Serbia and Montenegro or Zimbabwe?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 124,079 t against 116,480 t in Zimbabwe as of 2005.
- What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Serbia and Montenegro and Zimbabwe?
- 7,599 t, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Import quantity with 74 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.