United Republic of Tanzania vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

United Republic of Tanzania
-29.84 % change on previous year
in 2024
Yugoslav SFR
-29.12 % change on previous year
in 1991
United Republic of Tanzania rank
175th
Yugoslav SFR rank
174th

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Yugoslav SFR
0200400196219932024

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports -29.12 % change on previous year against -29.84 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.72 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 175th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 174th of 210 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 22.23 % change on previous year 13.69 % change on previous year 8.54 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 9.51 % change on previous year 2.36 % change on previous year 7.15 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 23.41 % change on previous year 1.15 % change on previous year 22.26 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1990s -3.04 % change on previous year -22.16 % change on previous year 19.11 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, United Republic of Tanzania or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at -29.12 % change on previous year against -29.84 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1991.
What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between United Republic of Tanzania and Yugoslav SFR?
0.72 % change on previous year, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Yugoslav SFR?
30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 175th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 174th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/united-republic-of-tanzania/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/united-republic-of-tanzania/yugoslav-sfr/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 11,937 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.