Afghanistan vs Lithuania: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Afghanistan
38,955 t
in 2024
Lithuania
37,428 t
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
69th
Lithuania rank
71st
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Afghanistan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 38,955 t against 37,428 t in Lithuania, a difference of 1,527 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 69th and Lithuania ranks 71st of 212 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,883 t | 18,800 t | 15,917 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 3,234 t | 29,800 t | 26,566 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 9,410 t | 45,092 t | 35,682 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 20,151 t | 44,586 t | 24,434 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Afghanistan or Lithuania?
- Afghanistan, at 38,955 t against 37,428 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Afghanistan and Lithuania?
- 1,527 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Lithuania?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Lithuania rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Afghanistan ranks 69th and Lithuania ranks 71st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.