Azerbaijan vs Mozambique: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Azerbaijan
19,421 t
in 2024
Mozambique
19,425 t
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
92nd
Mozambique rank
91st
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Azerbaijan
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 19,425 t against 19,421 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 4 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 92nd and Mozambique ranks 91st of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,693 t | 1,125 t | 7,568 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 2,158 t | 3,163 t | 1,005 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 11,444 t | 4,742 t | 6,702 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 24,985 t | 11,283 t | 13,702 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Azerbaijan or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 19,425 t against 19,421 t in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Azerbaijan and Mozambique?
- 4 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Mozambique?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Mozambique rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Azerbaijan ranks 92nd and Mozambique ranks 91st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.