Barbados vs Djibouti: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Barbados
40 t
in 2024
Djibouti
26 t
in 2024
Barbados rank
184th
Djibouti rank
185th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Djibouti
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 40 t against 26 t in Djibouti, a difference of 14 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.5 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 184th and Djibouti ranks 185th of 212 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1,052 t | 108 t | 944.25 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 1,000 t | 38.25 t | 961.75 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 295.12 t | 6.88 t | 288.25 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 298.2 t | 15.6 t | 282.6 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 93 t | 26.4 t | 66.6 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Barbados or Djibouti?
- Barbados, at 40 t against 26 t in Djibouti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Barbados and Djibouti?
- 14 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Djibouti?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Djibouti rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 184th and Djibouti ranks 185th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.