Barbados vs Faroe Islands: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Barbados
40 t
in 2024
Faroe Islands
18 t
in 2024
Barbados rank
184th
Faroe Islands rank
187th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 40 t against 18 t in Faroe Islands, a difference of 22 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 2.2 times Faroe Islands's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Barbados ranks 184th and Faroe Islands ranks 187th of 212 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 295.12 t | 202.88 t | 92.25 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 298.2 t | 53.5 t | 244.7 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 93 t | 16.2 t | 76.8 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Barbados or Faroe Islands?
- Barbados, at 40 t against 18 t in Faroe Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Barbados and Faroe Islands?
- 22 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Faroe Islands?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Faroe Islands rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 184th and Faroe Islands ranks 187th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.