Belarus vs Nigeria: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Belarus
111,718 t
in 2024
Nigeria
125,807 t
in 2024
Belarus rank
38th
Nigeria rank
35th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Belarus
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 125,807 t against 111,718 t in Belarus, a difference of 14,089 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 38th and Nigeria ranks 35th of 212 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 116,000 t | 59,225 t | 56,775 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 132,280 t | 36,025 t | 96,255 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 158,984 t | 75,686 t | 83,299 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 103,667 t | 96,986 t | 6,681 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Belarus or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 125,807 t against 111,718 t in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Belarus and Nigeria?
- 14,089 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Nigeria rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Belarus ranks 38th and Nigeria ranks 35th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.