Bhutan vs Palestine, State of: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Bhutan
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 289 t against 273 t in Palestine, State of, a difference of 16 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Palestine, State of's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Bhutan ranks 167th and Palestine, State of ranks 168th of 212 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 251.62 t | 3,573 t | 3,322 t | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 271.7 t | 2,591 t | 2,320 t | Palestine, State of |
| 2020s | 243.8 t | 1,924 t | 1,680 t | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Bhutan or Palestine, State of?
- Bhutan, at 289 t against 273 t in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Bhutan and Palestine, State of?
- 16 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Palestine, State of?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Palestine, State of rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Bhutan ranks 167th and Palestine, State of ranks 168th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.