Central Asia vs Poland: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Central Asia
103,217 t
in 2024
Poland
211,218 t
in 2024
Central Asia rank
28th
Poland rank
26th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Central Asia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 211,218 t against 103,217 t in Central Asia, a difference of 108,001 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 2.0 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Central Asia ranks 28th and Poland ranks 26th of 31 groups.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 254,064 t | 274,149 t | 20,084 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 161,605 t | 362,960 t | 201,355 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 246,480 t | 350,830 t | 104,350 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 179,489 t | 270,087 t | 90,598 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Central Asia or Poland?
- Poland, at 211,218 t against 103,217 t in Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Central Asia and Poland?
- 108,001 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Poland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Central Asia and Poland rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Central Asia ranks 28th and Poland ranks 26th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.