China, Hong Kong SAR vs Puerto Rico: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 230 t against 219 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 11 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 171st and Puerto Rico ranks 170th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 444.88 t | 394.25 t | 50.62 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 388.2 t | 720.1 t | 331.9 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 224 t | 262.2 t | 38.2 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, China, Hong Kong SAR or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 230 t against 219 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico?
- 11 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 171st and Puerto Rico ranks 170th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.