Congo vs Cuba: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Congo
2,244 t
in 2024
Cuba
2,023 t
in 2024
Congo rank
145th
Cuba rank
147th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Congo
- Cuba
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2,244 t against 2,023 t in Cuba, a difference of 221 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Cuba ahead.
Congo ranks 145th and Cuba ranks 147th of 212 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 121 t | 56,222 t | 56,101 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 175.67 t | 79,363 t | 79,188 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 880.8 t | 37,440 t | 36,559 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 318.2 t | 19,237 t | 18,919 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 236.4 t | 19,884 t | 19,648 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 1,169 t | 4,018 t | 2,850 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Congo or Cuba?
- Congo, at 2,244 t against 2,023 t in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Congo and Cuba?
- 221 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Cuba?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Cuba rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 145th and Cuba ranks 147th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.