Congo vs Gambia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Congo
2,244 t
in 2024
Gambia
1,685 t
in 2024
Congo rank
145th
Gambia rank
148th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Congo
- Gambia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2,244 t against 1,685 t in Gambia, a difference of 559 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Gambia ahead.
Congo ranks 145th and Gambia ranks 148th of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 121 t | 956.11 t | 835.11 t | Gambia |
| 1980s | 175.67 t | 917 t | 741.33 t | Gambia |
| 1990s | 880.8 t | 260 t | 620.8 t | Congo |
| 2000s | 318.2 t | 519.55 t | 201.35 t | Gambia |
| 2010s | 236.4 t | 357 t | 120.6 t | Gambia |
| 2020s | 1,169 t | 667.6 t | 501 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Congo or Gambia?
- Congo, at 2,244 t against 1,685 t in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Congo and Gambia?
- 559 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Gambia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Gambia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 145th and Gambia ranks 148th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.