Congo vs Jamaica: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Congo
2,244 t
in 2024
Jamaica
2,370 t
in 2024
Congo rank
145th
Jamaica rank
143rd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Congo
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 2,370 t against 2,244 t in Congo, a difference of 126 t.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Jamaica ahead.
Congo ranks 145th and Jamaica ranks 143rd of 212 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 121 t | 3,513 t | 3,392 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 175.67 t | 3,336 t | 3,161 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 880.8 t | 5,027 t | 4,146 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 318.2 t | 3,425 t | 3,107 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 236.4 t | 2,792 t | 2,556 t | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 1,169 t | 2,376 t | 1,207 t | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Congo or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 2,370 t against 2,244 t in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Congo and Jamaica?
- 126 t, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Jamaica?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Jamaica rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 145th and Jamaica ranks 143rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.