Cuba vs Fiji: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cuba
2,023 t
in 2024
Fiji
1,328 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
147th
Fiji rank
150th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Fiji
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2,023 t against 1,328 t in Fiji, a difference of 695 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.5 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 147th and Fiji ranks 150th of 212 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 77,901 t | 769.11 t | 77,132 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 59,810 t | 1,797 t | 58,013 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 79,946 t | 4,494 t | 75,451 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 34,820 t | 2,970 t | 31,850 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 19,237 t | 762.5 t | 18,474 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 19,884 t | 1,156 t | 18,728 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 4,018 t | 1,849 t | 2,169 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cuba or Fiji?
- Cuba, at 2,023 t against 1,328 t in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cuba and Fiji?
- 695 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Fiji?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Fiji rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 147th and Fiji ranks 150th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.