Cuba vs Gambia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cuba
2,023 t
in 2024
Gambia
1,685 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
147th
Gambia rank
148th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Gambia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2,023 t against 1,685 t in Gambia, a difference of 338 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Gambia's.
Across all 61 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 147th and Gambia ranks 148th of 212 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 93,100 t | 280 t | 92,820 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 59,810 t | 874.6 t | 58,935 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 79,946 t | 923.1 t | 79,023 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 34,820 t | 320 t | 34,500 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 19,237 t | 519.55 t | 18,717 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 19,884 t | 357 t | 19,527 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 4,018 t | 667.6 t | 3,351 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cuba or Gambia?
- Cuba, at 2,023 t against 1,685 t in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cuba and Gambia?
- 338 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Gambia?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Gambia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 147th and Gambia ranks 148th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.